US Salary Benchmarking Guide 2025: Essential Data for International Businesses
As international businesses look to expand into the United States market, one of the most crucial aspects of successful expansion is understanding the complex landscape of employee compensation. This guide will help you navigate salary benchmarking across different states, regions, and positions in the USA, enabling you to make informed decisions about your US hiring strategy.
Salary Benchmarking Best Practices for International Companies
Successfully navigating the US job market requires a strategic approach to salary benchmarking. This process is particularly crucial for international companies as it directly impacts their ability to attract and retain top talent in a highly competitive market.
1. Building a Strong Foundation
When expanding into the US market, companies should first determine their hiring strategy – whether they need employees in specific locations near clients or if they can hire remotely. For companies hiring remotely, the focus shifts to finding talent pools and considering practical factors like time zone alignment (many European companies prefer East Coast talent to minimize time differences). Understanding these strategic needs should precede any location-specific salary analysis.
2. Leveraging Multiple Data Sources
While many companies rely solely on public salary databases, the most effective benchmarking strategy involves triangulating data from multiple sources. Industry-specific salary surveys often provide the most relevant data, particularly those focused on your company’s size and sector. Professional networks and local business associations can offer valuable insights into regional trends and emerging compensation patterns. Additionally, government resources such as the Bureau of Labor Statistics provide reliable baseline data for broader market trends.
- Compensation platforms like Payscale, Salary.com, and Glassdoor provide comprehensive data but may lag current market conditions
- Popular job boards (Indeed, LinkedIn) offer real-time salary ranges, particularly valuable since many US states now require salary transparency in job postings
- Industry-specific surveys from organizations like Radford (technology) or Mercer (cross-industry)
- Government resources like the Bureau of Labor Statistics for baseline trends
- Local business associations and professional networks for regional insights
Each source has its strengths and limitations. Job boards show current market rates but may skew high, while compensation platforms offer more historical context but might lag behind rapid market changes.
3. Developing Market-Appropriate Ranges
Rather than fixing specific numbers, successful companies develop salary ranges that provide flexibility while maintaining internal equity. Effective salary ranges typically span 30-40% from minimum to maximum, with wider ranges (up to 50%) for senior positions requiring extensive experience. For example, a mid-level software developer position might range from $120,000 to $160,000, while a senior role could span $150,000 to $225,000. These ranges should account for:
- Entry-level positions: 20-30% range spread
- Mid-level positions: 30-40% range spread
- Senior/leadership positions: 40-50% range spread
- Experience premiums: typically 15-20% increase for each 3-5 years of relevant experience
It’s crucial to remember that US employees often expect regular salary reviews and clear progression paths, so your ranges should include room for growth and advancement.
4. Understanding Total Compensation
In the US market, base salary typically represents 70-80% of total compensation for most roles. Annual bonuses range from 5-15% of base salary for individual contributors and 10-25% for management positions, though this varies by industry and company stage. In the technology sector, equity plays a crucial role – early-stage startups might offer 0.01-0.5% equity for senior roles, while public companies typically grant RSUs valued at 10-20% of base salary annually. Benefits packages, including health insurance, 401(k), and paid time off, generally add 20-30% to the base salary cost for employers. Companies should consider these components holistically when developing compensation packages, as US candidates often evaluate offers based on total compensation rather than base salary alone.
5. Regular Market Analysis
The US job market is dynamic, with compensation trends evolving rapidly in response to economic conditions, industry developments, and changing worker expectations. Successful companies establish regular review cycles to ensure their compensation remains competitive. This doesn’t necessarily mean increasing salaries annually but staying informed about market movements and adjusting strategy accordingly.
State-by-State Salary Variations
When benchmarking salaries for US expansion, state-specific factors are crucial in determining appropriate compensation levels. These variations go beyond simple cost-of-living adjustments and reflect complex economic ecosystems within each state. Key factors influencing state-level salary variations include state tax structures, local labor markets, industry concentrations, and regulatory environments.
States with no income tax, such as Texas, Florida, and Washington, often allow for lower gross salaries while maintaining competitive take-home pay. Conversely, high-tax states like California and New York typically require higher base salaries to offset increased tax burdens. Additionally, state-specific employment laws, minimum wage requirements, and mandatory benefits can significantly impact total compensation costs.
Labor market competition also varies substantially by state, with some regions experiencing intense talent wars in specific sectors, driving up compensation. For instance, California’s technology sector competition extends beyond Silicon Valley, affecting salaries across the state, while Massachusetts sees similar effects in biotechnology and healthcare.
Here’s a comprehensive comparison of average salary adjustments needed relative to the national baseline, accounting for these various factors:
State | % Adjustment from National Baseline | Cost of Living Index* |
California | +25-40% | 151.7 |
New York | +20-35% | 148.2 |
Massachusetts | +15-25% | 131.6 |
Washington | +15-25% | 110.7 |
New Jersey | +15-25% | 115.2 |
Colorado | +10-20% | 105.6 |
Oregon | +10-20% | 130.1 |
Texas | +5-15% | 91.5 |
Florida | +5-15% | 97.9 |
Virginia | +5-15% | 101.8 |
Illinois | +5-10% | 94.5 |
Minnesota | +5-10% | 97.2 |
North Carolina | +0-10% | 94.9 |
Arizona | +0-10% | 102.2 |
Utah | +0-10% | 98.4 |
Ohio | -5-5% | 90.8 |
Michigan | -5-5% | 89.6 |
*US Average = 100 (2025 projected)
For baseline salary data, reference: US Bureau of Labor Statistics
Understanding Regional Variations in the US Job Market
The United States job market is notably diverse, with significant variations in salary expectations across different regions. These variations are primarily driven by cost of living, local market conditions, industry concentration, and talent availability. For practical purposes, we can divide the country into several key regions:
Coastal Tech Hubs (San Francisco Bay Area, Seattle, New York City)
These regions command the highest salaries across most positions due to the concentration of technology companies and the high cost of living. In the San Francisco Bay Area, total compensation packages frequently exceed national averages by 40-60% for tech roles and 25-35% for non-tech positions. Silicon Valley proper (Palo Alto, Mountain View, Cupertino) typically sees even higher premiums, with senior software engineers often receiving compensation packages above $350,000. Seattle’s tech sector, driven by Amazon, Microsoft, and numerous startups, typically offers compensation 25-35% above national averages while maintaining a slightly lower cost of living than the Bay Area.
Northeast Corridor (Boston to Washington DC)
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/boston-massachusetts-BOSTONTG0221-719aef2eeb1c4929b6c839715e34a69e.jpg)
This region features firm financial services, healthcare, and education sectors, significantly varying between major cities. New York City leads with financial sector salaries 30-45% above national averages, particularly in investment banking and fintech. Boston commands premium biotech and healthcare technology salaries, typically 20-30% above national averages. The Washington DC metro area, including Northern Virginia’s growing tech corridor, offers federal contractor premiums and tech salaries 15-25% above national averages, with additional benefits from government-adjacent positions.
Southern Tech Hubs (Austin, Miami, Raleigh-Durham, Nashville)
These emerging tech centers have experienced rapid growth, offering increasingly competitive compensation while maintaining lower living costs. Austin leads with tech salaries reaching 15-20% above national averages, driven by major tech companies and startup relocations. Miami’s growing financial and tech ecosystem offers 10-15% premiums, with additional benefits from Florida’s tax structure. The Research Triangle (Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill) specializes in biotech and software development, with salaries 5-15% above national averages. Nashville’s emerging tech scene offers salaries at national averages but benefits from no state income tax and lower living costs.
Midwest Tech Centers (Chicago, Minneapolis, Detroit, Columbus)
These traditional industrial centers have developed diverse tech ecosystems while maintaining cost advantages. Chicago leads with fintech and trading technology salaries 10-20% above national averages. Minneapolis-St. Paul, with its strong healthcare technology sector, offers premiums of 5-15%. Detroit’s automotive technology renaissance has driven tech salaries 5-10% above national averages, particularly in autonomous vehicle development. Columbus’s growing insurtech and retail technology sectors offer salaries at or slightly above national averages with significantly lower living costs.
Mountain Region Tech Hubs (Denver, Salt Lake City, Phoenix)
These rapidly growing regions offer an attractive combination of lifestyle and compensation. Denver’s tech ecosystem commands salaries 10-20% above national averages, particularly in software development and aerospace technology. Salt Lake City’s “Silicon Slopes” offers compensation 5-15% above national averages with a lower cost of living. Phoenix’s growing tech sector provides salaries at or slightly above national averages with significant tax advantages.
Position-Specific Salary Benchmarks
Understanding position-specific salary benchmarks is critical for international companies expanding into the US market. The American job market is characterized by highly specialized roles, clear career progression paths, and significant variations in compensation based on experience, industry, and location. Unlike many other countries, US salary structures often include multiple components beyond base pay, making understanding the full compensation landscape essential.
When evaluating position-specific benchmarks, companies must consider several key factors: the role’s strategic importance within the organization, the scarcity of required skills in the local market, industry-standard compensation structures, and the impact of company size and funding stage on compensation capabilities. Additionally, the rapid evolution of specific roles, particularly in technology and emerging fields, means that salary benchmarks can shift significantly from year to year.
US compensation packages typically have four main components: base salary, performance-based bonuses or commissions, equity or long-term incentives, and benefits. The weight of each component varies significantly by role, industry, and company stage. For instance, sales roles often have a lower base salary but higher commission potential, while technical roles might offer substantial equity compensation, particularly in startup environments.
This section breaks down compensation benchmarks across different functional areas, from technology and business operations to professional services and executive leadership. Each category includes detailed salary ranges, typical bonus structures, and equity considerations where applicable. These benchmarks represent national averages and should be adjusted to regional and state-specific factors.
Executive Leadership (Medium-Sized Companies)
Executive compensation in the US market is highly variable and often includes significant performance-based components. Total compensation packages typically consist of base salary, performance bonus, equity, and extensive benefits.
Role | Base Salary Range | Target Bonus | Expected Equity* |
CEO | $150,000 – $300,000 | 30-60% | 4.0-12.0% |
President | $140,000 – $275,000 | 25-50% | 3.0-7.0% |
COO | $125,000 – $250,000 | 20-40% | 2.0-5.0% |
CFO | $130,000 – $260,000 | 20-40% | 2.0-5.0% |
CTO | $140,000 – $275,000 | 25-45% | 2.0-6.0% |
CMO | $120,000 – $240,000 | 20-40% | 2.0-5.0% |
CHRO | $110,000 – $225,000 | 20-40% | 1.5-4.0% |
*Equity percentages typically higher than large companies to offset lower cash compensation
Technology Roles
The technology sector continues to be one of the most dynamic and competitive areas for talent acquisition in the United States. Companies must consider base salary and equity compensation, which often makes up 20-50% of total compensation for senior roles. The rise of remote work has influenced salary structures, with many companies adopting location-based pay scales while maintaining competitive total packages.
Key trends influencing technology compensation:
- Increasing competition from non-traditional tech employers (retail, finance, healthcare)
- Growing emphasis on specialized skills in AI, machine learning, and cloud architecture
- Rising importance of security and privacy expertise
- Shift toward full-stack development capabilities
Software Engineering Roles | |||
Entry Level | $70,000 – $100,000 | 0-10% | 0-0.01% |
Mid-Level | $100,000 – $150,000 | 10-15% | 0.01-0.05% |
Senior Level | $150,000 – $250,000 | 15-20% | 0.05-0.1% |
Principal/Staff | $200,000 – $400,000 | 20-25% | 0.1-0.3% |
Engineering Manager | $180,000 – $300,000 | 20-30% | 0.2-0.5% |
Director of Engineering | $250,000 – $400,000 | 25-35% | 0.3-1.0% |
VP of Engineering | $300,000 – $500,000 | 30-50% | 0.5-2.0% |
CTO | $350,000 – $600,000 | 40-60% | 1.0-5.0% |
*Equity ranges for early-stage startups. Later-stage companies typically offer RSUs with equivalent value.
**RSUs (Restricted Stock Units) are company shares granted to employees that vest over time, typically 4 years. Public companies and late-stage startups offer RSUs instead of stock options, with annual grant values roughly equivalent to the equity percentages shown.
Business and Operations Roles
Business roles in the US market require strategic thinking, analytical capabilities, and strong leadership skills. These positions often bridge technical teams and market opportunities, making them crucial for international companies expanding into the US market.
The compensation structure typically includes a base salary, performance bonus, and potential equity for senior roles. Commission structures for sales roles can significantly increase total compensation, often exceeding the base salary for top performers.
Marketing Roles | |||
Marketing Associate | $60,000 – $80,000 | 5-10% | 0-0.01% |
Marketing Manager | $80,000 – $120,000 | 10-15% | 0.01-0.05% |
Senior Marketing Manager | $120,000 – $180,000 | 15-20% | 0.05-0.1% |
Marketing Director | $150,000 – $250,000 | 20-30% | 0.1-0.3% |
VP of Marketing | $200,000 – $350,000 | 25-40% | 0.3-1.0% |
CMO | $300,000 – $500,000 | 30-50% | 1.0-3.0% |
Sales Roles | Base Salary Range | Commission Target | Expected Equity* |
Sales Development Rep | $45,000 – $60,000 | 30-50% of base | 0-0.01% |
Account Executive | $60,000 – $100,000 | 50-100% of base | 0.01-0.05% |
Senior Account Executive | $100,000 – $150,000 | 70-120% of base | 0.05-0.1% |
Sales Manager | $120,000 – $180,000 | 60-100% of base | 0.1-0.3% |
Sales Director | $150,000 – $250,000 | 50-100% of base | 0.2-0.5% |
VP of Sales | $200,000 – $350,000 | 50-100% of base | 0.5-2.0% |
CRO | $300,000 – $500,000 | 50-100% of base | 1.0-3.0% |
Operations Roles | Base Salary Range | Target Bonus | Expected Equity* |
Operations Associate | $55,000 – $75,000 | 5-10% | 0-0.01% |
Operations Manager | $75,000 – $110,000 | 10-15% | 0.01-0.05% |
Senior Operations Manager | $110,000 – $160,000 | 15-20% | 0.05-0.1% |
Operations Director | $140,000 – $220,000 | 20-30% | 0.1-0.3% |
VP of Operations | $180,000 – $300,000 | 25-40% | 0.3-1.0% |
COO | $250,000 – $450,000 | 30-50% | 1.0-3.0% |
Source: Glassdoor
Professional Services
Professional services roles form the backbone of organizational infrastructure and compliance. These positions require specific certifications, advanced degrees, or specialized training, and compensation often reflects years of experience and credentials.
The market for these roles has become increasingly competitive as companies seek professionals navigating complex regulatory environments and driving organizational efficiency.
Accounting/Finance Roles | Base Salary Range | Target Bonus | Expected Equity* |
Junior Accountant | $50,000 – $70,000 | 5-10% | 0-0.01% |
Senior Accountant | $70,000 – $100,000 | 10-15% | 0.01-0.03% |
Accounting Manager | $100,000 – $150,000 | 15-20% | 0.03-0.1% |
Finance Director | $150,000 – $250,000 | 20-35% | 0.1-0.3% |
VP of Finance | $200,000 – $350,000 | 25-40% | 0.3-1.0% |
CFO | $300,000 – $500,000 | 30-50% | 1.0-3.0% |
Human Resources Roles | Base Salary Range | Target Bonus | Expected Equity* |
HR Coordinator | $45,000 – $65,000 | 5-10% | 0-0.01% |
HR Manager | $65,000 – $95,000 | 10-15% | 0.01-0.03% |
Senior HR Manager | $95,000 – $140,000 | 15-20% | 0.03-0.1% |
HR Director | $140,000 – $200,000 | 20-30% | 0.1-0.3% |
VP of HR | $180,000 – $300,000 | 25-40% | 0.3-1.0% |
CHRO | $250,000 – $450,000 | 30-50% | 1.0-3.0% |
Additional Compensation Considerations
Benefits Package Valuation
American employees typically expect a comprehensive benefits package, which can add 25-40% to the base salary cost for employers. Standard benefits include:
Health Insurance: This is the most crucial benefit for US employees. Companies typically cover a significant portion of the monthly premium for employees and their dependents. The cornerstone of US benefits packages, typically costing employers $500-1,200 per employee monthly. The type of coverage (HMO, PPO, or HDHP) can significantly impact costs.
401(k) Retirement Plans: A standard retirement savings plan where employers often match a percentage of employee contributions. This has become an expected benefit and is crucial in attracting talent. Standard employer match ranges from 3-6% of salary, with the most common being 50% match up to 6% of employee contribution (effectively 3% of salary). Tech companies and larger employers often offer higher matches of 4-6% to remain competitive.
Paid Time Off: This includes vacation days, sick leave, and public holidays. While the US has no federal requirements for paid time off, competitive packages are essential for attracting and retaining talent. Market standards include 10-15 vacation days for new employees, increasing to 15-20 days after 3-5 years. Most companies offer 5-7 sick days annually and 8-10 paid holidays. Tech companies often provide more generous packages of 15-20 initial vacation days or unlimited PTO policies.
Other Benefits: Additional offerings such as life insurance, disability insurance, and wellness programs have become increasingly important in creating comprehensive packages that attract top talent.
For a detailed guide on US employee benefits, compliance requirements, and best practices for international companies, visit our comprehensive resource: US Employee Benefits Guide for International Companies.
Equity Compensation
Equity compensation is often a significant component of total compensation for technology companies and startups. Early-stage startups might offer 0.1-1% equity for senior roles, while larger companies typically offer RSUs (Restricted Stock Units) valued at 20-40% of base salary annually.
Expert Support for International Companies
Navigating these complexities can be challenging for international companies entering the US market, which is where Foothold America‘s services become invaluable. Our experienced team of HR professionals provides comprehensive support in all aspects of US hiring, including salary benchmarking, compensation strategy development, and end-to-end recruitment through our Exclusive Talent Acquisition (ETA) Service. From initial market analysis to final offer negotiation, we help international companies understand local market dynamics, establish competitive compensation packages, and ensure compliance with all relevant regulations. Our deep understanding of regional variations and industry-specific trends helps ensure that our clients’ compensation packages are both competitive and cost-effective.
Creating Sustainable Compensation Structures
The ultimate goal of salary benchmarking is not just to set competitive starting salaries but to create sustainable compensation structures that support long-term growth. This means developing frameworks that balance attracting talent, maintaining internal equity, and managing costs. Successful companies typically establish clear compensation philosophies that align with their overall business strategy and culture while remaining flexible enough to adapt to changing market conditions.
By taking a comprehensive approach to salary benchmarking and leveraging expert support when needed, international companies can successfully navigate the complexities of the US job market and build strong, sustainable teams in their target locations.
Conclusion
Successful salary benchmarking in the US requires a nuanced understanding of regional variations, industry standards, and regulatory requirements. To remain competitive in the dynamic US job market, international businesses should approach compensation planning with flexibility and regular review cycles. Consider working with local compensation consultants and legal advisors to develop and maintain an effective compensation strategy that attracts and retains top talent while ensuring compliance with all applicable regulations.
Remember that these benchmarks represent general guidelines and should be adjusted based on your specific industry, company size, funding stage, and strategic objectives. Regular market analysis and adjustment of your compensation strategy will be key to successful expansion in the US market. As experts in US expansion with over a decade of experience, Foothold America has helped hundreds of international companies successfully navigate the complexities of the American job market. Our deep understanding of regional and industry-specific compensation trends ensures that your company can establish and maintain competitive positions in the US market.
GET IN TOUCH
Contact Us
Complete the form below, and one of our US expansion experts will get back to you shortly to book a meeting with you. During the call, we will discuss your business requirements, walk you through our services in more detail and answer any questions you might have.
